regency dress – butterick 6630

One of the major problems I had when setting out to make a Regency dress was I had absolutely zero idea what I was doing. I’ve followed a few costumier blogs for several months, but they were all far too advanced to be of any real use. I’ve since found a community on Facebook that specialises in Regency costume and is really very helpful, but just typing things like Regency Dress into Google is really not very.

Which is how I came to be using this pattern. With hindsight I would say, if you want something that is at all for reenactment use something by Sense and Sensibility or Laughing Moon. However for my purposes, I needed something for Regency dancing, but I had no idea if I was going to continue doing it long term, and so for a first dress, although I wanted something I could get away with at a local group Regency dance (it would not do for a proper ball) I also wanted to use fabric that was already in my stash, and if possible make something I could use for goth clubbing as well, just incase I ended up not dancing regularly.

So I didn’t do the research I should have done before buying the pattern (always, always do a google image search and look for any blog reviews before you buy a pattern!) and then when with a deadline looming and after it was far too late to change my plans I did do a bit of research it wasn’t very helpful.

Google image search brought up only about 3 results I could see were actually of that pattern, only one of which I actually thought was the sort of thing I was aiming for. There was a similar blank space with blog reviews, with only a ‘don’t even go there, it fits no-one’ and a ‘its ok for women with very small busts’ to make me very nervous about what I was about to do.

However I would say, with certain provisos, I found this pattern a lot better than I expected to and actually have a wearable result out of it…..

butterick 6630 b butterick 6630 a butterick 6630 c butterick 6630 d


Obviously if I’d had any sense I’d have lengthened the sleeves to hide the bingo wings, (a rater distressing weight related side effect of the medication I’m on) but I wasn’t sure whether that would be in the slightest bit period accurate. But I’m rather pleased with this, especially as I got to the trying it on before putting in the eyelets (yeah complete lack of accuracy there, but seriously wasn’t going to sew them myself) and thought it wouldn’t remotely fit and was a total write off.

Which leads me to problem number one of this dress….it only works if your waist measurement is properly smaller than your bust, and your stomach does not stick out at all. The images above are being brought to you by the most un-period pair of heavy duty control pants! I actually had appropriate period underwear ready, and indeed fitted the bodice to fit a set of stays, but in the event I looked like a pregnant tube of smarties with it on underneath.

Basically the problem is. even cutting according to my bodice size (40″) which meant I went a good two sizes down on where I would have gone if I’d gone according to my waist and bum sizes, the bodice is still rather big, I had to take an inch in across the centre to make it fit (hence the pretty ribbon decoration down the front, sneakily hiding a seam) it is also exceedingly low cut, when I tried it with my stays it took a serious amount of jiggling not to have them sticking out, and finding an appropriate modern bra that didn’t show wasn’t much easier. I would actually disagree with the review I read and say that while this is not for ladies with giant chests perhaps, it certainly isn’t for flat chested boyish figures only!

Even with hindsight I think given the gape I made the right decision to cut the smaller size, but this has lead to severe difficulties with the waist and bum. It is the first time I had attempted an empire line dress and they are not all designed equal. This one is supposed to have a completely flat front and is infact fairly narrow most of the way down. As I said, it only fits with severe support underwear.

If you look at the back, you can see the not fitting thing a bit more clearly…..

butterick 6630 back

It also does not help that the instructions for adding the lacing were somewhat random, so I winged it, it actually needs a few hooks and eyes on the bottom of the back seam that I have yet to add. These were mentioned in the instructions, but it wasn’t made clear where or why you needed to add them. To be fair that was the only bit of the instructions I had any problem with, it was actually quite an easy dress to make. I am spectacularly proud of myself for getting the eyelets in ok though as it was my first attempt at them and they are notoriously difficult to manage without Β£100 specialist equipment.

The inside of the dress is supposed to be lined however, and here is major problem two with this pattern: the way you are supposed to attach the bust lining is to hem it, and then stretch it over the seams that connect the arms and the skirt to the bodice in order to conceal it. Which is great in principle, and would look very pretty, except the lining pieces are cut on the same pattern pieces as the outer fabric, and therefore are the same size to slightly smaller when hemmed and therefore will not fit at all over the seams they are supposed to. Although there is the vague possibility I could have helped this by cutting a bit more accurately, my recommendation would be to redraft the bust pieces and make them a good 2 cm bigger on the armhole and the bottom (where it meets the skirt) . I tried sewing them down but it stretched the bodice way out of proportion, so I ended up letting the bodice lining hang loose. This however leads to problems at the front….


….with clearly visible lining, but its nothing that a bit of topstitching wouldn’t fix. I was going to avoid it, cuz machine topstitching is really not period, but then the whole thing is not period so it doesn’t matter anyway.

The above picture also gives you a really good view of the fabric I used, which is a dark purple synthetic (frayed like anything) with a small diamond check pattern. I did actually see something similar on a dress from the time but in a different colour way, so maybe not as horrifically inaccurate as all that. I was having a rebellion against white and pastel colours when I designed it though, it does make it difficult for Regency if you don’t like white or pastel!

Main fabric and cotton lining are off the very cheap market stall (Β£2.50 a meter) the lace is off eBay, and the ribbon is actually from a Scandinavian homewear shop called Tiger that has a branch locally and cost Β£1 for a massive roll, they have art supplies and knitting wool very cheap as well.

Anyway, gratuitous trim on the hem shot….


So overall I am very proud of it. It has ended up that we are unable to carry on Regency dancing as our local trainline is victim of the major refurbishment program at London Bridge and late night trains have been cut from Waterloo and Charring Cross, meaning it became significantly more difficult to get back from Surbiton (where the classes are held) late at night, so we have transferred our attention to swing dancing classes that have recently started in Lewisham instead. Regency dancing is definitely something I will go back to when I get the chance though, but I am very glad I took the inauthentic approach and made the dress suitable for a goth party dress as that way I will actually get wear out of it.

Anyway, I am actually massively behind in posting what I’ve done on here, I’ve already completed another dress and have one more and some jewellery underway. So I will actually have to catch up on blogging in the near future.

9 thoughts on “regency dress – butterick 6630

  1. its good for a first attempt, but I think the main deficiency with the pattern is the skirt needs more skirt. there should be gathers at the back and then a little bumpad so it doesn’t cling too much. I advise that if the bodice fits you could use that again, but do your own skirt of basically two full widths of cloth, flat at the front like the originals but pleated in to the bodice at the back. This is not a difficult thing to do yourself and not only would it look nicer but it would give you more swish and legroom for dancing.

    perhaps you could make a pair of black net oversleeves with a pretty frill at the cuff, tucked under the sleeve at the top. It would look reasonably period, esp for mourning wear which is all about modesty (although I think mourning actaully nixes dancing), cover your bingo wings, and be removeable should you need to do so. Use a nice soft tulle net, something like the finer spotted hat vieling you can buy, and all you basically need is two elasticated leg warmers for your arms – you could even use a bridal tulle in white and the contrast would be very pretty indeed, esp if you teamed it with one of the little white ruffed partlets that were fashionable.

    try looking at the thinner of the two nancy bradfield books, which gives a lot of construction details from original garments and accesories

    • Thanks! Thats so much a more sensible way forward, actually the bodice is too low cut for me to be totally comfortable with, specially as it doesn’t go with my stays, so I’m not going to use it again, but I will look out for something with your suggested method of construction for the skirt, that really does make more sense!
      I can’t quite visualise what you mean about the sleeves, but i will do some googling, and i have a black swiss dot tulle that would do nicely when I work out quite what you mean! πŸ™‚
      Will also google Nancy Bradfield!

    • Having used google, I like your oversleeves idea very much, i will probably go for undersleeves though as that allows me to use fabric already in my collection (and is also very goth!) πŸ™‚
      Do you mean Costume in Detail by Nancy Bradfield? It looks an extremely useful book and has gone on my Amazon Wishlist! πŸ™‚

      • Yes, that’s the book. My regency dresses have all been retro engineered from there as I’m not good with patterns. Black dot tulle is exactly what I a as thinking of, but I couldn’t remember what the name was.
        The pattern you’ve used is really a fancy dress pattern, if you read brad field you’ll see that most of the originals do up at the front( considerably easier to put on), and the skirt closures are simpler ones which don’t use laces opr eyelets.
        If you lived near me I’d bring one of mine round and show you

  2. actaully it would look lovely if you took the skirt off that bodice and made a new skirt of simple muslin in white,(muslin tends to be narrow so you’d need a few widths) whcih would give a sort of faux spencer effect

  3. Thats an awesome idea, but I am going to leave the skirt where it is for now, I have recently messed around with my medication and started loosing some weight, so hopefully in 6 months time it will actually fit properly! πŸ™‚

  4. I’ve made that dress twice, once in a white embroidered cotton and once in taffeta with a train for a ball gown. I used large sized hooks in the back instead of the eyelets and lacing and that worked well. I also added some lace along the edge of the bodice, between the lining and the fabric so it sticks up a bit and fills in the neckline a bit. My biggest problem is that it tends to ride up a bit since I’m small busted. I’ve since bought a more period authentic pattern to try out. Good luck with the false sleeves. Those are a great idea.

    • I was thinking of that with the lace round the neck, I have some spare. However I’m going to see if I can loose a bit of weight first and then reevaluate how to wear it! πŸ™‚ your versions sound lovely!

  5. Pingback: What I made 2016…. | euphoricstimuli

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s